Richardson, Michael K. (Author)
Keuck, Gerhard (Author)
Biological Reviews Published for the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Volume: 77
Pages: 495--528
Publication date: 2002
Language: English
One of the central, unresolved controversies in biology concerns the distribution of primitive versus advanced characters at different stages of vertebrate development. This controversy has major implications for evolutionary developmental biology and phylogenetics. Ernst Haeckel addressed the issue with his Biogenetic Law, and his embryo drawings functioned as supporting data. We re-examine Haeckel's work and its significance for modern efforts to develop a rigorous comparative framework for developmental studies. Haeckel's comparative embryology was evolutionary but non-quantitative. It was based on developmental sequences, and treated heterochrony as a sequence change. It is not always clear whether he believed in recapitulation of single characters or entire stages. The Biogenetic Law is supported by several recent studies – if applied to single characters only. Haeckel's important but overlooked alphabetical analogy of evolution and development is an advance on von Baer. Haeckel recognized the evolutionary diversity in early embryonic stages, in line with modern thinking. He did not necessarily advocate the strict form of recapitulation and terminal addition commonly attributed to him. Haeckel's much-criticized embryo drawings are important as phylogenetic hypotheses, teaching aids, and evidence for evolution. While some criticisms of the drawings are legitimate, others are more tendentious. In opposition to Haeckel and his embryo drawings, Wilhelm His made major advances towards developing a quantitative comparative embryology based on morphometrics. Unfortunately His's work in this area is largely forgotten. Despite his obvious flaws, Haeckel can be seen as the father of a sequence-based phylogenetic embryology.
...MoreSimilar Citations
Article
Levit, Georgy S.;
Hossfeld, Uwe;
Olsson, Lennart;
(2015)
Alexei Sewertzoff and Adolf Naef: Revising Haeckel's Biogenetic Law
Book
Amundson, Ronald;
(2005)
The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo
Book
Love, Alan C.;
(2015)
Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific And Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development
Thesis
Love, Alan Christopher;
(2005)
Explaining Evolutionary Innovation and Novelty: A Historical and Philosophical Study of Biological Concepts
Book
Keiko Sato;
(2015)
Hekkeru to shinka no fantaji: Ichigenron, ekoroji, keitouju ヘッケルと進化の夢:一元論,エコロジー,系統樹 Haeckel and the Fantasy of Evolution: Monism, Ecology, and the Genealogical Tree
Article
Schmitt, Stéphane;
(2003)
Homeosis and Atavistic Regeneration: The “Biogenetic Law” in Entwicklungsmechanik
Article
Minelli, Alessandro;
(2003)
L'omologia rivisitata
Article
Kuratani, Shigeru;
(2003)
Evolutionary Developmental Biology and Vertebrate Head Segmentation: A Perspective from Developmental Constraint
Article
Kaplan, Jonathan Michael;
Pigliucci, Massimo;
(2001)
Genes “for” Phenotypes: A Modern History View
Article
Peterson, Erik L.;
(2011)
The Excluded Philosophy of Evo-Devo? Revisiting C.H. Waddington's Failed Attempt to Embed Alfred North Whitehead's “Organicism” in Evolutionary Biology
Article
Ute Deichmann;
(2017)
Hierarchy, Determinism, and Specificity in Theories of Development and Evolution
Essay Review
Maclaurin, James;
(2003)
The Good, the Bad and the Impossible
Chapter
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
Lamarckian Problematics in Biology
Article
Fuller, Trevon;
(2003)
The Integrative Biology of Phenotypic Plasticity
Article
Collin C. Rice;
(2015)
Factive Scientific Understanding Without Accurate Representation
Thesis
Hendrikse, Jesse Love;
(2006)
Explanation and Inheritance
Article
Wimsatt, William;
(2001)
Richard Levins as Philosophical Revolutionary
Book
Robert, Jason Scott;
(2004)
Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously
Chapter
Alessandro Minelli;
(2015)
I limiti temporali e la periodizzazione dello sviluppo
Chapter
Aldo Fasolo;
Davide Lovisolo;
(2015)
"The Cell in Development and Inheritance", centoventi anni dopo. E.B. Wilson, la teoria cellulare e il tassello mancante: la membrana plasmatica
Be the first to comment!