Hatfield, Gary Carl (Author)
This paper examines the claims of the Gestalt psychologists that there was a crisis in experimental psychology ca. 1900, which arose because the prevailing sensory atomism excluded meaning from among psychological phenomena. The Gestaltists claim that a primary motivation of their movement was to show, against the speculative psychologists and philosophers and Verstehen historians, that natural scientific psychology can handle meaning. Purportedly, they revealed this motivation in their initial German-language presentations but in English emphasized their scientific accomplishments for an American audience. The paper finds that: there was a recognized crisis in the new experimental psychology ca. 1900 pertaining especially to sensory atomism; that the Gestaltists responded to the crisis with new experimental findings and theoretical concepts (Gestalten) that challenged atomism; in both languages, they raised problems of meaning and discussed the contest with speculative psychology and philosophy only after presenting their scientific case; that they introduced phenomenological observations on meaning and perceptual organization into their psychology but did not develop a theory of meaning or solve philosophical problems; that they argued philosophically, that is, using abstract, conceptual arguments; and that this aspect of their cognitive style was not received well by some prominent members of their American audience.
...MoreArticle Sturm, Thomas; Mülberger, Annette (2012) Crisis Discussions in Psychology---New Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (p. 425).
Article
Sinico, Michele;
(2015)
Tertiary Qualities, from Galileo to Gestalt Psychology
Article
Feest, Uljana;
(2012)
Husserl's Crisis as a Crisis of Psychology
Article
ter Hark, Michel;
(2010)
The Psychology of Thinking before the Cognitive Revolution: Otto Selz on Problems, Schemas, and Creativity
Article
Feest, Uljana;
(2007)
Science and Experience/Science of Experience: Gestalt Psychology and the Anti-Metaphysical Project of the Aufbau
Article
Guski-Leinwand, Susanne;
(2010)
The Split Between the So-Called Modern and Experimental Psychology in Germany in the 1920s and Its Influence on Psychology in Italy
Article
Wolffram, Heather;
(2009)
In the Laboratory of the Ghost-Baron: Parapsychology in Germany in the Early 20th Century
Book
Pietro Gori;
(2018)
Ernst Mach: tra scienza e filosofia
Article
Benjafield, John G.;
(2008)
Revisiting Wittgenstein on Köhler and Gestalt Psychology
Article
Plháková, Alena;
(2008)
Reflections on the Main Schools of the World Psychology in the Czech Interwar Psychology
Book
Max Wertheimer;
Viktor Sarris;
(2020)
Max Wertheimer Productive Thinking
Article
Marion A. Schmidt;
(2017)
Planes of Phenomenological Experience: The Psychology of Deafness as an Early Example of American Gestalt Psychology, 1928–1940
Chapter
Ash, Mitchell G.;
(2009)
Max Wertheimer und Wolfgang Köhler: Gestalttheorie als dritter Weg zwischen Natur- und Geisteswissenschaft
Article
Benjamin Sheredos;
(2021)
Merleau-Ponty’s implicit critique of the new mechanists
Article
Cat, Jordi;
(2007)
Switching Gestalts on Gestalt Psychology: On the Relation between Science and Philosophy
Article
Sloan, Phillip R.;
(2012)
How Was Teleology Eliminated in Early Molecular Biology?
Article
Robinson, David K.;
(2010)
Gustav Fechner: 150 Years of Elemente der Psychophysik
Article
Meischner-Metge, Anneros;
(2010)
Gustav Theodor Fechner: Life and Work in the Mirror of His Diary
Article
Robinson, David K.;
(2010)
Fechner's “Inner Psychophysics”
Book
David J. Murray;
Stephen W. Link;
(2020)
The Creation of Scientific Psychology
Book
Klempe, Sven Hroar;
(2014)
Kierkegaard and the Rise of Modern Psychology
Be the first to comment!