Aristotle vs Galen: Medieval Reception of Ancient Embryology - Medieval Medicine and the 13th Century Controversy over Plurality/Unicity of Substantial Form (2019)
Hyun Sok Chung (Author)
Korean Journal of Medical History
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Pages: 239-290
Publication date: 2019
Language: Korean
In their embryology, Aristotle and Galen greatly disagreed on the role of human derived materials like menstrual blood and vaginal secretion (called by them female sperm or semen). This gap made those two ancients also disagree on their understanding of mother’s role in the generation of the human body in her womb. During the Middle Ages, especially during the thirteenth century, the scholastics drew on those two ancient thoughts for some rational underpinnings of their philosophical and theological doctrines. However, the manners of adoption and assimilation were varied. For example, Albert the Great strived to reconcile the two in the image of Avicenna, one of the main and the most important sources of Galenist medicine in the thirteenth Century. By contrast, those scholastics who played an important role in the controversy over plurality/unicity of the substantial form, drew on their disagreements. For example, pluralists like Bonaventure, William of la Mare, and Duns Scotus appealed to Galenist medical perspective to underpin their positions and paved ways to decorate Virgin Mary’s motherhood and her active contribution to the Virgin birth and to the manhood of her Holy Son. in contrast a unicist like Thomas Aquinas advanced his theory in line with Aristotelian model that Mary’s role in her Son’s birth and manhood was passive and material. Giles, another unicist, while repudiating Galenist embryology with the support of Averroes’s medical work called Colliget, alluded to some theologically crucial impieties with which might be associated some pluralists’ Mariology based on the Roman physician’s model. In this processus historiae, we can see not only the intertwining of medieval medicine, philosophy, and theology, but some critical moments where medicine provided, side by side with philosophy, natural settings and explanations for religious marvels or miracles such as the Virgin birth, the motherhood of Mary, the manhood of Christ, etc. Likewise, we can observe two medieval maxims coincide and resonate: “philosophia ancilla theologiae” and “philosophia et medicina duae sorores sunt.”
...MoreSimilar Citations
Book
Fidora, Alexander;
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias;
(2007)
Erfahrung und Beweis: die Wissenschaften von der Natur im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert
Book
Longeway, John Lee;
(2007)
Demonstration and Scientific Knowledge in William of Ockham. A Translation of Summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and Selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio
Thesis
Massobrio, Simona.;
(1991)
Aristotelian matter as understood by St. Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus
Article
Smith, C. U. M.;
(2013)
Cardiocentric Neurophysiology: The Persistence of a Delusion
Article
José Filipe Silva;
(2015)
Potentially Human? Aquinas on Aristotle on Human Generation
Article
Adams, Marilyn McCord;
(1992)
The resurrection of the body according to three medieval Aristotelians: Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, William Ockham
Article
Noone, Timothy B.;
(2009)
Scotus on Mind and Being: Transcendental and Developmental Psychology
Book
Lee, Richard A., Jr.;
(2002)
Science, the Singular, and the Question of Theology
Article
Pini, Giorgio;
(2009)
Scotus on the Possibility of a Better World
Article
Thijssen, J.M.;
(1987)
Twins as monsters: Albertus Magnus's theory of the generation of twins and its philosophical context
Chapter
Gregory, Tullio;
(2008)
Cosmogonia biblica e cosmologie cristiane
Thesis
Taylor, Michael A.;
(1982)
Human generation in the thought of Thomas Aquinas: A case study on the role of biological fact in theological science
Chapter
Cova, Luciano;
(2004)
Prius animal quam homo: Aspetti dell'embriologia tommasiana
Article
Libera, Alain de;
(1990)
Albert le Grand et Thomas d'Aquin interprètes du Liber de causis
Article
Carlos Steel;
(2017)
What is the Advantage of Knowing the Future? Some Comments on Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos, I, 3
Chapter
Janssens, Jules;
(2007)
The Reception of Avicenna's Physics in the Latin Middle Ages
Chapter
Zambelli, Paola;
(1991)
Le stelle “sorde e mute” ed i loro “motori” alle origini della scienza moderna? Un case-study storiografico
Chapter
Mainoldi, Ernesto Sergio;
(2008)
Metabolé e metánoia. Il ruolo dell'antropologia biblico-patristica nelle stazioni del pensiero teologico medievale a fronte al problema cosmologico
Book
Casagrande, Carla;
Vecchio, Silvana;
(2009)
Piacere e dolore: Materiali per una storia delle passioni nel Medioevo
Article
Antoine Calvet;
(2019)
Essai sur la constitution et la transmission de corpus alchimiques latins aux XIIIe-XVe siècles: Albert le Grand, Thomas d’Aquin, Roger Bacon
Be the first to comment!