Maddy, Penelope (Author)
Oxford University Press
Publication date: 2017
Language: English
Physical Details: 264
How do you know the world around you isn't just an elaborate dream, or the creation of an evil neuroscientist? If all you have to go on are various lights, sounds, smells, tastes and tickles, how can you know what the world is really like, or even whether there is a world beyond your ownmind? Questions like these -- familiar from science fiction and dorm room debates -- lie at the core of venerable philosophical arguments for radical skepticism: the stark contention that we in fact know nothing at all about the world, that we have no more reason to believe any claim -- that thereare trees, that we have hands -- than we have to disbelieve it. Like non-philosophers in their sober moments, philosophers, too, find this skeptical conclusion preposterous, but they're faced with those famous arguments: the Dream Argument, the Argument from Illusion, the Infinite Regress of Justification, the more recent Closure Argument. If these can't bemet, they raise a serious challenge not just to philosophers, but to anyone responsible enough to expect her beliefs to square with her evidence. What Do Philosophers Do? takes up the skeptical arguments from this everyday point of view, and ultimately concludes that they don't undermine our ordinary beliefs or our ordinary ways of finding out about the world. In the process, Maddy examines and evaluates a range of philosophical methods --common sense, scientific naturalism, ordinary language, conceptual analysis, therapeutic approaches -- as employed by such philosophers as Thomas Reid, G. E. Moore, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and J. L. Austin. The result is a revealing portrait of what philosophers do, and perhaps a quiet suggestion forwhat they should do, for what they do best.
...MoreReview Santiago Echeverri (2018) Review of "What Do Philosophers Do?: Skepticism and the Practice of Philosophy". Metascience: An International Review Journal for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science (pp. 117-121).
Similar Citations
Book
Duncan Pritchard;
(2015)
Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing
Essay Review
Peter Davson-Galle;
(2018)
Radical Scepticism: An Issue for Science Education?
Book
Hecht, Jennifer Michael;
(2004)
Doubt: A History: The Great Doubters and Their Legacy of Innovation from Socrates and Jesus to Thomas Jefferson and Emily Dickinson
Book
Lee, Maurice S.;
(2012)
Uncertain Chances: Science, Skepticism, and Belief in Nineteenth-Century American Literature
Thesis
Hynes, Darren;
(2003)
Descartes as Faust: Dissimulation and Descartes as an Early-Modern Scientist
Article
Jeremy Dunham;
(2015)
Idealism, Pragmatism, and the Will to Believe: Charles Renouvier and William James
Article
Horowitz, Amir;
(2013)
Doubt Accumulation and the Epistemic Validity of Logic
Book
Pierre Janet;
Stéphane Gumpper;
Florent Serina;
(2021)
Les formes de la croyance
Book
Leonardo Ambasciano;
D. Jason Slone;
Donald Wiebe;
Luther H. Martin;
Radek Kundt;
William W. McCorkle Jr;
(2018)
An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge
Book
Bell, Millicent;
(2002)
Shakespeare's Tragic Skepticism
Article
Thorsrud, Harald;
(2003)
Is the Examined Life Worth Living? A Pyrrhonian Alternative
Book
Cao, Gian Mario;
(2007)
Scepticism and Orthodoxy: Gianfrancesco Pico as a Reader of Sextus Empiricus; with a Facing Text of Pico's Quotations from Sextus
Chapter
Popkin, Richard H.;
(2000)
Scepticisme et sciences modernes (XVIe-XVIIe siècles)
Chapter
Borghero, Carlo;
(2001)
Cartesius scepticus. Aspects de la querelle sur le scepticisme de Descartes dans la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle
Chapter
Popkin, Richard H.;
(2008)
Amos Funkenstein and the History of Skepticism
Article
Zagorin, Perez;
(2001)
Francis Bacon's concept of objectivity and the idols of the mind
Book
Bett, Richard Arnot Home;
(2000)
Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and his Legacy
Book
Moreau, Pierre-François;
(2001)
Le scepticisme au XVIe et au XVIIe siècle
Article
R. J. W. Mills;
(2015)
The Reception of ‘That Bigoted Silly Fellow’ James Beattie's Essay on Truth in Britain 1770–1830
Article
Philip Choi;
(2019)
Reliabilism, Scepticism, and Evidentia in Ockham
Be the first to comment!