Adaptation as Process: The Future of Darwinism and the Legacy of Theodosius Dobzhansky (2011)
Depew, David J. (Author)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Volume: 42
Pages: 89--98
Publication date: 2011
Language: English
Edition Details: Part of a special issue, “Defining Darwinism: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Debate”
Conceptions of adaptation have varied in the history of genetic Darwinism depending on whether what is taken to be focal is the process of adaptation, adapted states of populations, or discrete adaptations in individual organisms. I argue that Theodosius Dobzhansky's view of adaptation as a dynamical process contrasts with so-called adaptationist views of natural selection figured as design-without-a-designer of relatively discrete, enumerable adaptations. Correlated with these respectively process and product oriented approaches to adaptive natural selection are divergent pictures of organisms themselves as developmental wholes or as bundles of adaptations. While even process versions of genetical Darwinism are insufficiently sensitive to the fact much of the variation on which adaptive selection works consists of changes in the timing, rate, or location of ontogenetic events, I argue that articulations of the Modern Synthesis influenced by Dobzhansky are more easily reconciled with the recent shift to evolutionary developmentalism than are versions that make discrete adaptations central.
...MoreArticle Hull, David L. (2011) Defining Darwinism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (p. 2).
Similar Citations
Article
Alan Grafen;
(2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism?
Article
Kutschera, Ulrich;
Niklas, Karl J.;
(2004)
The Modern Theory of Biological Evolution: An Expanded Synthesis
Book
Richard G. Delisle;
Maurizio Esposito;
David Ceccarelli;
(2024)
Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology: Deconstructing Darwinism
Book
John P. Jackson;
David J. Depew;
(2017)
Darwinism, Democracy, and Race: American Anthropology and Evolutionary Biology in the Twentieth Century
Article
Maureen A. O’Malley;
(2018)
The Experimental Study of Bacterial Evolution and Its Implications for the Modern Synthesis of Evolutionary Biology
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
Article
Maurizio Meloni;
(2017)
Disentangling life: Darwin, selectionism, and the postgenomic return of the environment
Article
Delisle, Richard G.;
(2011)
What Was Really Synthesized during the Evolutionary Synthesis? A Historiographic Proposal
Article
Mallet, James;
(2010)
Why Was Darwin's View of Species Rejected by Twentieth Century Biologists?
Article
Delisle, Richard G.;
(2008)
Expanding the Framework of the Holism/Reductionism Debate in Neo-Darwinism: The Case of Theodosius Dobzhansky and Bernhard Rensch
Chapter
Burian, Richard M.;
(2007)
“Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution” (Theodosius Dobzhansky)
Article
Hull, David L.;
(2011)
Defining Darwinism
Book
Caporael, Linnda R.;
Griesemer, James R.;
Wimsatt, William C.;
(2014)
Developing Scaffolds in Evolution, Culture, and Cognition
Article
Levit, Georgy S.;
Hossfeld, Uwe;
Olsson, Lennart;
(2014)
The Darwinian Revolution in Germany: From Evolutionary Morphology to the Modern Synthesis
Article
John Beatty;
(2019)
The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part II: The Synthesis and Since
Book
D. M. Walsh;
(2015)
Organisms, Agency, and Evolution
Article
Max Meulendijks;
(2021)
Eclipsing the Eclipse?: A Neo-Darwinian Historiography Revisited
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
Book
Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira;
Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice;
Stefano, Waldir;
Martins, Roberto de Andrade;
(2007)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 2
Article
Brian McLoone;
(2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins
Be the first to comment!