Bender, Renato (Author)
Tobias, Phillip V. (Author)
Bender, Nicole (Author)
The reconstruction of the human past is a complex task characterized by a high level of interdisciplinarity. How do scientists from different fields reach consensus on crucial aspects of paleoanthropological research? The present paper explores this question through an historical analysis of the origin, development, and reception of the savannah hypotheses (SHs). We show that this model neglected to investigate crucial biological aspects which appeared to be irrelevant in scenarios depicting early hominins evolving in arid or semi-arid open plains. For instance, the exploitation of aquatic food resources and other aspects of hominin interaction with water were largely ignored in classical paleoanthropology. These topics became central to alternative ideas on human evolution known as aquatic hypotheses. Since the aquatic model is commonly regarded as highly controversial, its rejection led to a stigmatization of the whole spectrum of topics around water use in non-human hominoids and hominins. We argue that this bias represents a serious hindrance to a comprehensive reconstruction of the human past. Progress in this field depends on clear differentiation between hypotheses proposed to contextualize early hominin evolution in specific environmental settings and research topics which demand the investigation of all relevant facets of early hominins' interaction with complex landscapes.
...MoreArticle Delisle, Richard G. (2012) Human Evolution: An Agenda for History, Philosophy, and Social Studies. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (p. 3).
Article
Delisle, Richard G.;
(2012)
The Disciplinary and Epistemological Structure of Paleoanthropology: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Development
Article
Delisle, Richard G.;
(2012)
Welcome to the Twilight Zone: A Forgotten Early Phase of Human Evolutionary Studies
Article
Delisle, Richard G.;
(2012)
Human Evolution: An Agenda for History, Philosophy, and Social Studies
Article
Goodrum, Matthew R.;
(2012)
The Idea of Human Prehistory: The Natural Sciences, the Human Sciences, and the Problem of Human Origins in Victorian Britain
Article
Richmond, Jesse;
(2012)
Discipline and Credibility in the Post-War Australopithecine Controversy: Le Gros Clark versus Zuckerman
Article
Corbey, Raymond;
(2012)
Homo habilis's Humanness: Phillip Tobias as a Philosopher
Article
Claudine Cohen;
(2017)
“How nationality influences Opinion”: Darwinism and palaeontology in France (1859–1914)
Article
Kjærgaard, Peter C.;
(2014)
Inventing Homo gardarensis: Prestige, Pressure, and Human Evolution in Interwar Scandinavia
Article
Tattersall, Ian;
(2012)
Paleoanthropology and Evolutionary Theory
Article
Gundling, Tom;
(2012)
Stand and Be Counted: The Neo-Darwinian Synthesis and the Ascension of Bipedalism as an Essential Hominid Synapomorphy
Book
Christa Kuljian;
(2017)
Darwin's Hunch: Science, Race and the Search for Human Origins
Article
Hochadel, Oliver;
(2013)
Palaeoanthropology in the Periphery. An Introduction
Book
Gary Tomlinson;
(2018)
Culture and the Course of Human Evolution
Book
John H. Langdon;
(2016)
The Science of Human Evolution: Getting it Right
Book
Preuss, Dirk;
Hossfeld, Uwe;
Breidbach, Olaf;
(2006)
Anthropologie nach Haeckel
Article
Schwartz, Jeffrey H.;
(2012)
Molecular Anthropology and the Subversion of Paleoanthropology: An Example of “The Emperor's Clothes” Effect?
Article
Sommer, Marianne;
(2008)
History in the Gene: Negotiations between Molecular and Organismal Anthropology
Article
Pettitt, Paul B.;
White, Mark J.;
(2011)
Cave Men: Stone Tools, Victorian Science, and the “Primitive Mind” of Deep Time
Article
Alex Menez;
(2018)
The Gibraltar Skull: Early History, 1848–1868
Article
Goulden, Murray;
(2007)
Bringing Bones to Life: How Science Made Piltdown Man Human
Be the first to comment!