Ulett, Mark A. (Author)
Throughout the history of evolutionary theory a number of scientists have argued that evolution proceeds along a limited number of definite trajectories, a concept and group of theories known as orthogenesis. Beginning in the 1880s, influential evolutionists including Theodor Eimer, Edward Drinker Cope, and Leo Berg argued that a fully causal explanation of evolution must take into account the origin and nature of variation, an idea that implied orthogenesis in their views. This paper argues that these orthogenesis developed theories that were more than highly technical and theoretically dubious hypotheses accessible only to elite specialists, as certain histories of these ideas might suggest. Some orthogenesists made their case to a non-specialist audience to gain support for their ideas in the face of widespread controversy over evolutionary theory. Through a case study analysis of three major books by Eimer, Cope, and Berg, this paper contends that they sought to re-orient the central tenets of the science of evolution to include the causal impact of variation on evolutionary outcomes. These orthogenesists developed novel and synthetic evolutionary theories in a publishing platform suited for non-specialist audiences in an effort to impact the debates over evolutionary causation prevalent in the late-19th and early 20th centuries.
...MoreArticle Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty (2014) Disciplining and Popularizing: Evolution and Its Publics from the Modern Synthesis to the Present. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (p. 111).
Thesis
Ulett, Mark Andrew;
(2014)
Definitely Directed Evolution (1890--1926): The Importance of Variation in Major Evolutionary Works by Theodor Eimer, Edward Drinker Cope, and Leo Berg
Article
Popov, Igor;
(2008)
Orthogenesis versus Darwinism: The Russian Case
Chapter
Gliboff, Sander;
(2011)
The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866--1926
Book
Gabriele Ferrari;
(2023)
Polvere e ossa. Edward Drinker Cope e Othniel Charles Marsh, due paleontologi a caccia di dinosauri nel Far West
Article
Sullivan, Gregory;
(2011)
The Instinctual Nation-State: Non-Darwinian Theories, State Science and Ultra-Nationalism in Oka Asajiro's Evolution and Human Life
Article
James R. Jackson;
Aleta Quinn;
(2023)
Post-Darwinian fish classifications: Theories and methodologies of Günther, Cope, and Gill
Article
Levit, Georgy S.;
Olsson, Lennart;
(2006)
“Evolution on Rails”: Mechanisms and Levels of Orthogenesis
Article
Xiaobo Yu;
(2017)
Chinese paleontology and the reception of Darwinism in early twentieth century
Article
Bowler, Peter J.;
(1979)
Theodor Eimer and orthogenesis: Evolution by “definitely directed variation”
Article
Kate MacCord;
(2019)
The Impacts of Assumptions on Theories of Tooth Development and Evolution at the Turn of the Nineteenth Century
Book
Johnson, Rebecca L.;
(2013)
Battle of the Dinosaur Bones: Othniel Charles Marsh vs. Edward Drinker Cope
Article
Bowler, Peter J.;
(1977)
Edward Drinker Cope and the changing structure of evolutionary theory
Article
Laurent, Goulven;
(1979)
Un néo-larmarckien américain, Edward Drinker Cope (1840-1897)
Article
Schuller, Kyla;
(2012)
Taxonomies of Feeling: The Epistemology of Sentimentalism in Late-Nineteenth-Century Racial and Sexual Science
Article
Sheldon, Myrna Perez;
(2014)
Claiming Darwin: Stephen Jay Gould in Contests over Evolutionary Orthodoxy and Public Perception, 1977--2002
Article
Cooke, Bill;
(2010)
Joseph McCabe: A Forgotten Early Populariser of Science and Defender of Evolution
Book
Stuart Mathieson;
(2020)
Evangelicals and the Philosophy of Science: The Victoria Institute, 1865-1939
Book
Gundlach, Bradley J.;
(2013)
Process and Providence: The Evolution Question at Princeton, 1845-1929
Book
Zarimis, Maria;
(2015)
Darwin's Footprint: Cultural Perspectives on Evolution in Greece (1880--1930s)
Article
John Beatty;
(2019)
The Creativity of Natural Selection? Part II: The Synthesis and Since
Be the first to comment!