How did expert engagement with the security state shape quotidian professional scientific practice? In this essay, I explore a dispute in 1956 between two prominent geneticists in the United States about the proper way to apply results with Drosophila to human radiation risk. The disagreement ended with a hastily called summit meeting at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, but the views of the two key geneticists involved did not change much. Human geneticist James V. Neel (1915--2000) continued to believe that radiation risk could only be assessed through studies of human populations, and Drosophilist Herman J. Muller (1890--1967) continued to argue that results with Drosophila suggested alarming risks to people all over the world. The dispute itself is only one of many about radiation risk and certainly not even the most important one -- though I do think that historians have been insufficiently interested in general in the logic of extrapolation across species. But I suggest here that this single argument provides a way to begin to explore the roles of anger as professional practice in mid-century genetics, and by implication in technical networks in general. The evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr, observing a different dispute between H. J. Muller and Theodosius Dobzhansky, once asked `what makes the geneticists such a bunch of emotional prima donnas?'
...MoreBook Gausemeier, Bernd; Müller-Wille, Staffan; Ramsden, Edmund (2013) Human Heredity in the Twentieth Century.
Article
Goldstein, Donna M.;
Stawkowski, Magdalena E.;
(2015)
James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation
Article
Kuchinskaya, Olga;
(2011)
Articulating the Signs of Danger: Lay Experiences of Post-Chernobyl Radiation Risks and Effects
Article
Susan Lindee;
(2016)
Human genetics after the bomb: Archives, clinics, proving grounds and board rooms
Thesis
Green, Lisa Anne;
(2012)
Science for Survival: The Modern Synthesis of Evolution and the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
Article
Weiss, Kenneth M.;
Schull, William J.;
(2002)
Perspectives Fulfilled: The Work and Thought of J. V. Neel (1915--2000)
Article
Carlson, Elof Axel;
(1987)
Eugenics and basic genetics in H. J. Muller's approach to human genetics
Thesis
Stickgold-Sarah, Jessie;
(2011)
The Textual Body: Genetics and Dystopia in American Fiction
Book
El-Haj, Nadia Abu;
(2012)
The Genealogical Science: The Search for Jewish Origins and the Politics of Epistemology
Article
Dove, William;
Susman, Millard;
(2012)
James F. Crow (1916--2012)
Article
Leeming, William;
(2011)
Graphical and Computationally Intensive Techniques for Presenting and Disseminating Information about the Genetics of Disease: Possibilities, Limitations, and Additions
Thesis
Dingel, Molly J.;
(2006)
“A Window into the Soul”: Gender and News Coverage of Genetic Research
Article
Hogan, Andrew J.;
(2012)
Visualizing Carrier Status: Fragile X Syndrome and Genetic Diagnosis since the 1940s
Article
Vivette García-Deister;
Carlos López-Beltrán;
(2015)
País de gordos/país de muertos: Obesity, death and nation in biomedical and forensic genetics in Mexico
Chapter
Chadarevian, Soraya de;
(2013)
Putting Human Genetics on a Solid Basis: Human Chromosome Research, 1950s--1970s
Book
Reardon, Jenny;
(2005)
Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics
Article
Richardson, Sarah S.;
(2012)
Sexing the X: How the X Became the “Female Chromosome”
Article
Frank, Reanne;
(2015)
Back to the Future? The Emergence of a Geneticized Conceptualization of Race in Sociology
Article
Barns, Ian;
Schibeci, Renato;
Davison, Aidan;
Shaw, Robyn;
(2000)
“What do you think about genetic medicine?” Facilitating sociable public discourse on developments in the new genetics
Essay Review
Sebastián Gil-Riaño;
(2017)
Redemptive Ancestries: Human Population Genetics, Sex and Antiracism
Article
Nemec, Birgit;
Zimmer, Fabian;
(2019)
Wie aus Umweltforschung die genetische Pränataldiagnostik entstand: Über eine Methodenverschiebung in der Vorsorge um 1970. (The Emergence of Genetic Prenatal Diagnosis from Environmental Research: On a Methodological Shift in Prevention Around 1970.)
Be the first to comment!