Culpeper's herbal The English Physitian (1652) and its enlarged edition of the following year is unusual in its consistent attribution of a planetary correspondence for each plant, for which' astrological botany' it became the subject of negative scrutiny by historians of the herbal. While astrology was traditionally linked to the medical art, its influence did not normally extend to the identification of specific remedies needed in a given case by their astrological 'rulers'. Culpeper was using a macrocosm-microcosm analogy that was an aspect of the cosmology of Paracelsian medicine. This was applied both to the gathering of the herbs under a propitiolls sky and their clinical use according to astrological concepts of sympathy and antipathy. The astrological authors among the cited sources for the herbal, notably Antoine Mizauld, appear to have contributed little to Culpeper's correspondences. Analysis of these according to his explicit or implicit justifications in the text show that a herb might correspond to a planet because it strengthens the organ ruled by the planet, or by the doctrine of signatures or because its manifest qualities are shared by the planet. Over half of the herbs have no such correspondence and are often linked according to their medicinal actions on target organs, a link frequently supported by their visual appearance according to a doctrine of signatures.
...MoreBook Dorian Gieseler Greenbaum; Charles Burnett (2015) From Māshāʾallāh to Kepler: Theory and Practice in Medieval and Renaissance Astrology.
Book
Thick, Malcolm;
(2010)
Sir Hugh Plat: The Search for Useful Knowledge in Early Modern London
Thesis
Allen George Debus;
(1961)
The English Paracelsians: A Study of Iatrochemistry in England to 1640
Article
Michael J. G. Farthing;
(2015)
Nicholas Culpeper (1616–1654): London’s First General Practitioner?
Book
Culpeper, Nicholas;
Flannery, Michael A.;
(2007)
The English Physician
Article
Elizabeth Yale;
(2016)
The Book and the Archive in the History of Science
Book
Bromyard & District Local History Society, ;
(2007)
A Pocketful of Hops: Hop Growing in the Bromyard Area
Book
Darr, Orna Alyagon;
(2011)
Marks of an Absolute Witch: Evidentiary Dilemmas in Early Modern England
Article
John Considine;
(2022)
The Beginnings of English Paracelsian Lexicography: Two Collections of Words from Elizabethan Cambridge
Chapter
Elizabeth Spiller;
(2016)
Recipes for Knowledge: Maker’s Knowledge Traditions, Paracelsian Recipes, and the Invention of the Cookbook, 1600–1660
Chapter
Marcus, Leah S.;
(2019)
Paracelsian Medicine, Vitalism and Samson Agonistes
Article
Klein, Joel A.;
(2014)
Corporeal Elements and Principles in the Learned German Chymical Tradition
Article
Hedesan, Georgiana D.;
(2014)
Paracelsian Medicine and Theory of Generation in “Exterior homo”, a Manuscript Probably Authored by Jan Baptist Van Helmont (1579--1644)
Chapter
Gouk, Penelope;
(2012)
Clockwork or Musical Instrument? Some English Theories of Mind-Body Interaction Before and After Descartes
Chapter
Keitt, Andrew;
(2013)
The Devil in the Old World: Anti-Superstition Literature, Medical Humanism and Preternatural Philosophy in Early Modern Spain
Article
Lawrence M. Principe;
(2020)
The Development of the Basil Valentine Corpus and Biography: Pseudepigraphic Corpora and Paracelsian Ideas
Article
Kathrin Pfister;
(2016)
Kenelm Digby (1603–1665) und das ‚sympathetische‘ Pulver – ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der pseudo-paracelsischen Waffensalbe
Article
Gunhild Pörksen;
(2016)
„Darum nun sollt ihr wissen, daß der Mensch ein Magnet ist…“. Magnetismus als Urphänomen in Paracelsus’ naturwissenschaftlichen Schriften
Book
Didier Kahn;
Hiro Hirai;
(2021)
Pseudo-Paracelsus Forgery and Early Modern Alchemy, Medicine and Natural Philosophy
Article
McCarl, Mary Rhinelander;
(1996)
Publishing the works of Nicholas Culpeper, astrological herbalist and translator of Latin medical works in 17th-century London
Book
Woolley, Benjamin;
(2004)
Heal Thyself: Nicholas Culpeper and the Seventeenth-Century Struggle to Bring Medicine to the People
Be the first to comment!