Rick Kuhn (Author)
In 1943, Henryk Grossman sent a draft of the study, eventually published in two parts as ‘The Evolutionist Revolt against Classical Economics’, to Max Horkheimer for comment. His very hostile response, Grossman’s drafts and the published study cast light not only on the changing relationship between Grossman and Horkheimer but also on the distance between Grossman’s classical Marxism and nascent mature Critical Theory. Grossman’s study identified the emergence of the idea of successive economic systems in the work of Condorcet, Henri Saint-Simon and Simonde de Sismondi in France, James Steuart and Richard Jones in England, culminating in Marx’s formulations which entailed the role of class struggle and capitalism’s tendency to break down. Hegel was not an influence on Marx’s conception of modes of production. In addition to a series of spurious and minor criticisms, Horkheimer objected that Grossman’s approach was positivist, that it misconceived Hegel’s philosophy, and that it amounted to a conventional history of ideas. In response, Grossman made some changes in his study, but these were designed to strengthen his main arguments and successfully reaffirmed his Marxist approach in the face of Horkheimer’s criticisms.
...More
Essay Review
Roll-hansen, Nils;
(2012)
Marxist Roots of Science Studies
Article
Trigg, Andrew B.;
(2004)
Kalecki and the Grossman Model of Economic Breakdown
Book
Freudenthal, Gideon;
McLaughlin, Peter;
(2009)
The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann
Article
Freudenthal, Gideon;
(2005)
The Hessen-Grossman Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation
Book
Viren Murthy;
Fabian Schäfer;
Max Ward;
(2017)
Confronting Capital and Empire: Rethinking Kyoto School Philosophy
Book
Gorton, William A.;
(2006)
Karl Popper and the Social Sciences
Book
Rothschild, Emma;
(2001)
Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment
Chapter
Polianski, Igor J.;
(2012)
Between Hegel and Haeckel: Monistic Worldview, Marxist Philosophy, and Biomedicine in Russia and the Soviet Union
Article
Sherratt, Y.;
(2000)
Adorno and Horkheimer's Concept of “Enlightenment”
Article
Matthias Rothe;
Bastian Ronge;
(2016)
The Frankfurt School: Philosophy and (political) economy A thematic introduction by the editors
Chapter
Paolo Tripodi;
(2024)
Otto Neurath e il voltafaccia di Horkheimer. Alcune note su un dibattito geistesgeschichtlich
Article
Nathan Sperber;
(2019)
The Many Lives of State Capitalism: From Classical Marxism to Free-Market Advocacy
Book
Hein, Laura;
(2004)
Reasonable Men, Powerful Words: Political Culture and Expertise in Twentieth-Century Japan
Article
Fabio Lusito;
(2023)
The scientia case: scientific censorship and ideological struggles, 1973-1975
Article
Löhr, Gebhard;
(2012)
Max Planck -- ein Gegner des Christentums? Die Debatte um Plancks Haltung zur Religion nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg
Article
Olga Hoppe-Kondrikova;
Lukas M. Verburgt;
(2016)
On A.ya. Khinchin's Paper ‘ideas of Intuitionism and the Struggle for a Subject Matter in Contemporary Mathematics’ (1926): A Translation with Introduction and Commentary
Book
Angelo Calemme;
(2022)
Dalla Rivoluzione scientifica alla Rivoluzione industriale: Sulle condizioni marxiane dello sviluppo scientifico-tecnico
Chapter
Daniela Steila;
(2018)
La fortuna di Mach nella Russia pre-rivoluzionaria
Article
Martin, James;
(2009)
Ontology and Law in the Early Poulantzas
Article
Maria Antonia Rancadore;
(2017)
Jean-Paul Sartre tra fenomenologia e psicologia
Be the first to comment!